Lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG3) is the most recent checkpoint inhibitor to be targeted in the clinic. LAG3 has been shown to dampen T cell activity. For instance, diabetic-prone mice deficient in LAG3 exhibit accelerated autoimmune diabetes with 100% of KO mice developing it. As Foxp3+ regulatory T cells express LAG3 it was thought that it played a role in Treg activity.
Surprisingly, however, according to new study mice with Treg-specific LAG3 deficiency showed improved rather than diminished protection against development of autoimmune diabetes.
This unexpected outcome requires rethinking the role LAG3 within immune system. Systemic inhibition of LAG3 by blocking antibodies could enhance tumor progression, for example, by stimulating tumor-infiltrating Tregs.
Another paper, however, with ambitious title I read this week fell flat upon examining actual data. Its objective was to examine how viral infection could modify host's immune response to dietary antigens and lead to celiac disease. According to paper "celiac disease (CeD) is a complex immune disorder with an autoimmune component in which genetically susceptible individuals expressing the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DQ2 or DQ8 molecules display an inflammatory T helper 1 (TH1) immune response against dietary gluten present in wheat".
To replicate hypothetical scenario that could lead to celiac disease, the authors infected mice with reovirus and simultaneously gave them nominal antigen, OVA, as a dietary antigen. As virus induced inflammation, it led to reduced numbers of Foxp3+ Tregs and parallel increase in Th1 transcription factor, T-bet+ T cells specific for dietary antigen.
The authors concluded that viral infection could modify body's response to dietary antigens. However, such conclusion is premature here as it is not obvious that those T cells that were destined to become Foxp3+ regulatory T cells were actually diverted into Th1 lineage. It is not clear either what would be the outcome of dietary antigen exposure once viral infection is cleared or how long the effect of viral infection modifies a physiological response to dietary antigens.
David Usharauli
No comments:
Post a Comment